Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <iliv(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch
Date: 2013-08-01 00:39:31
Message-ID: 20130801003931.GD14652@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier escribió:

> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Ivan Lezhnjov IV <iliv(at)commandprompt(dot)com>wrote:
>
> > The patch does pass 'make check' and 'make html' successfully.
> >
> Your patch does not add new code, but just documentation, so there is no
> risk that make check would fail, except if an error has been introduced by
> another commit at some point...

There's "make check" in the doc/src/sgml directory. It checks for SGML
consistency, absence of tabs and such.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-08-01 00:53:51 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-08-01 00:14:24 Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch