Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
Date: 2013-07-12 17:28:38
Message-ID: 20130712172838.GG29206@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:

> -- a couple of compromise proposals were made:
>
> a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get
> credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at
> the bottom of the release notes, or
>
> b) that all "names" move to a web page on www.postgresql.org and come
> out of the release notes entirely.
>
> Speaking as a commitfest manager, I favor compromise proposal (a),
> personally. Does (a) seem somehow terrible to anyone?

I like (a) myself, though I'd amend it so that "extensive work on the
patch" is required to qualify as co-author, which may or may not be
code.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-07-12 17:48:56 Re: column "b" is of type X but expression is of type text
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-07-12 17:24:00 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up