Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited
Date: 2013-07-12 06:32:18
Message-ID: 20130712063218.GB17906@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2013-07-08 12:16:34 +0300, hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com wrote:
>
> Ok, I've committed this patch now. Finally, phew!

Good.

I'd signed up to review this patch, and did spend some considerable time
on it, but although I managed to understand what was going on (which was
my objective), I didn't find anything useful to say about it beyond what
others had brought up already. Sorry.

> Thanks to everyone involved for the review and testing! And if you
> can, please review the patch as committed once more.

…so I read through the patch as committed again, and it looks good.

Thanks.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2013-07-12 08:11:19 Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2013-07-12 06:18:36 Re: [PERFORM] In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table