Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Date: 2013-07-04 02:38:34
Message-ID: 20130704023834.GK3592@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 04:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Josh Berkus escribió:
> >> Liming,
> >>
> >> Given that this patch will not be ready for commit this week, but has
> >> gotten a review, I am marking it as "Returned with Feedback". Please
> >> keep working on it, and as soon as you have a new version of the patch,
> >> add it to the September commitfest. Thanks!
> >
> > I don't think this patch has gotten any useful review actually.
>
> Oh? I thought it was at the state where Liming had to do a whole bunch
> of changes before it could be reviewed further?

No, the comments have been solely on the details of the extension
definition files and the like. There has been not a single comment
about the new algorithm being proposed, which is the interesting stuff
in this patch. Review can certainly proceed without regard for the sql
files at all.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2013-07-04 06:01:22 Mention in bgworker docs that db connection needs shmem access
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2013-07-04 01:51:55 Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2013-07-04 07:59:24 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-07-04 01:05:21 Re: news ticker Services Policy -- time for a change?