From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1) |
Date: | 2013-06-25 16:15:11 |
Message-ID: | 20130625161511.GC7716@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-06-25 12:11:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> >>> Please fix that and re-send the patch.
> >> Find attached diff wrt current master.
> > Thanks.
>
> I would like to solicit opinions on whether this is a good idea. I
> understand that the patch author thinks it's a good idea, and I don't
> have a strong position either way. But I want to hear what other
> people think.
>
> Anyone have an opinion?
+1. When writing scripts I like to use the long options because that
makes it easier to understand some time later. I don't really see a
reason not to do this.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-06-25 16:15:28 | Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-06-25 16:15:01 | Re: isolationtester and 'specs' subdirectory |