Re: local_preload_libraries logspam

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: local_preload_libraries logspam
Date: 2013-06-04 12:46:53
Message-ID: 20130604124653.GI12323@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-06-04 08:39:18 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/3/13 8:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Attached patch renders all "loaded library..." messages DEBUG1,
> >> regardless of whether local_preload_libraries or
> >> shared_preload_libraries is involved, and regardless of EXEC_BACKEND.
> >
> > Can someone take a look at this, please? I'd rather like to see this
> > issue fixed.
>
> I wasn't considering this for 9.3.

I don't really see a point in delaying it towards 9.4. The change itself
is trivial, doesn't change behaviour users can rely on directly. So
what's to be gained by waiting?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2013-06-04 13:09:48 Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-06-04 12:40:08 Re: create a git symbolic-ref for REL9_3_STABLE