| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |
| Date: | 2013-05-30 12:53:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20130530125337.GR6434@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Andres Freund (andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> But really, I am not at all concerned about some obscure values being
> returned, but about a read() not being successful..
Alright, so what do we need to do to test this? We really just need a
short C program written up and then a bunch of folks to run it on
various architectures, right? Gee, sounds like what the buildfarm was
made for (alright, alright, PostgreSQL isn't exactly a 'short C
program', but you get the idea). As I recall, Andrew reworked the
buildfarm code to be more modular too.. Anyone have thoughts about how
we could run these kinds of tests with it? Or do people think that's a
bad idea?
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-05-30 12:58:26 | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-05-30 12:50:38 | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |