Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul

Michael Paquier escribió:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> > Looks good to me too.
> > Based on the patch I already sent before, there are a couple of things
> > missing:
> > - There are no pg_ctl standby/recover commands implemented yet (no that
> > difficult to add)
> > - a certain amount of work is needed for documentation
> >
> > Btw, I have a concern about that: is it really the time to finish that for
> > this release knowing that the 9.3 feature freeze is getting close? I still
> > don't know when it will be but it is... close.
> >
> This patch is still in the current commit fest. Any objections in marking
> it as returned with feedback and put it in the next commit fest? We could
> work on that again at the next release as it looks that there is not much
> time to work on it for 9.3.

If the patch is almost ready, IMHO you should complete it and post a
version that implements the consensus design.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services