Re: Bug in tm2timestamp

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in tm2timestamp
Date: 2013-03-06 19:47:57
Message-ID: 20130306194757.GA8135@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:08:26PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Another point worth considering is that most of this is duplicated by
> ecpg's libpgtypes. Do we want to fix that one too, or do we just let it
> continue to be broken? I note that other bugs are already unfixed in
> ecpg's copy. One other idea to consider is moving these things to

Meaning that a fix wasn't put there, too?

> But in light of this bug and other already fixed date/time bugs, perhaps
> it's warranted? Opinions please.

I'd love to go to a single source. Most of libpgtypes was taken from the
backend back when it was developed.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2013-03-06 19:50:06 Re: Bug in tm2timestamp
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-03-06 19:38:45 Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY