Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
Date: 2013-03-04 18:39:18
Message-ID: 20130304183918.GN16142@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh,

* Josh Kupershmidt (schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I still think this patch is an improvement over the status quo, and is
> committable as-is. Yes, the patch doesn't address the existing
> ugliness with minimal_error_message() and sidestepping PSQLexec(), but
> at least it fixes the --echo-hidden behavior, and the various other
> issues may be handled separately.

Which patch, exactly, are you referring to wrt this..? I'm less than
convinced that it's in a committable state, but I'd like to make sure
that we're talking about the same thing here...

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Kupershmidt 2013-03-04 18:41:16 Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-04 18:38:27 Re: sql_drop Event Trigger