From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
Date: | 2013-03-04 18:39:18 |
Message-ID: | 20130304183918.GN16142@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh,
* Josh Kupershmidt (schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I still think this patch is an improvement over the status quo, and is
> committable as-is. Yes, the patch doesn't address the existing
> ugliness with minimal_error_message() and sidestepping PSQLexec(), but
> at least it fixes the --echo-hidden behavior, and the various other
> issues may be handled separately.
Which patch, exactly, are you referring to wrt this..? I'm less than
convinced that it's in a committable state, but I'd like to make sure
that we're talking about the same thing here...
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2013-03-04 18:41:16 | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-03-04 18:38:27 | Re: sql_drop Event Trigger |