| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, 'Craig Ringer' <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'Ants Aasma' <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'PostgreSQL Hackers' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Amit kapila' <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
| Date: | 2013-02-27 19:06:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20130227190634.GK16142@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zoltan,
* Boszormenyi Zoltan (zb(at)cybertec(dot)at) wrote:
> If we get rid of the per-statement variant, there is no need for that either.
For my 2c, I didn't see Tom's comments as saying that we shouldn't have
that capability, just that the implementation was ugly. :)
That said, perhaps we should just drop it for now, get the lock_timeout
piece solid, and then come back to the question about lock_timeout_stmt.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-02-27 19:09:21 | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-02-27 18:38:44 | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |