| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) |
| Date: | 2013-02-24 21:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20130224213144.GL16142@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Claudio Freire (klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > As another point, it's also the very first thing that we document in
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch to check for.
>
> TBH, that wiki link seems to suggest that *having context* is the
> point of the requirement (to be able to merge with fuzz).
The PG wiki link states "Is the patch in context diff format?" and
provides a link to the wikipedia article about *that specific format*.
There's absolutely zero confusion over what "context diff format" means.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-24 23:14:00 | Re: Show type in psql SELECT |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-24 20:46:37 | Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status |