Re: Materialized views WIP patch

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date: 2013-02-19 22:22:26
Message-ID: 20130219222226.GD5670@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:09:13PM +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On Sat, February 16, 2013 02:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > matview-v4.patch.gz
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if material views should not go into information_schema. I was thinking either
> .views or .tables. Have you considered this?

I'm guessing it'd be .views if anything. Haven't been able to
decipher from section 11 of the standard (Schemata) whether the
standard has anything to say on the matter.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-02-19 22:30:52 Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-02-19 22:18:24 Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-02-19 22:30:52 Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-02-19 22:18:24 Re: Materialized views WIP patch