Re: logical changeset generation v4

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4
Date: 2013-01-23 15:26:16
Message-ID: 20130123152616.GA7048@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-01-23 10:18:50 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > With the (attached for convenience) patch applied you can do
> > # ALTER TABLE replication_metadata SET (treat_as_catalog_table = true);
> >
> > to enable this.
> > What I wonder about is:
> > * does anybody have a better name for the reloption?
>
> IMHO, it should somehow involve the words "logical" and "replication".

Not a bad point. In the back of my mind I was thinking of reusing it to
do error checking when accessing the heap via index methods as a way of
making sure index support writers are aware of the complexities of doing
so (c.f. ALTER TYPE .. ADD VALUE only being usable outside
transactions).
But thats probably over the top.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-01-23 15:29:56 Re: WIP: index support for regexp search
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-01-23 15:18:50 Re: logical changeset generation v4