Re: ThisTimeLineID in checkpointer and bgwriter processes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ThisTimeLineID in checkpointer and bgwriter processes
Date: 2012-12-20 13:39:20
Message-ID: 20121220133920.GD4303@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2012-12-20 13:32:36 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 20 December 2012 13:19, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >> So I think we're good on that front. But I'll add a comment there, and
> >> use 0 explicitly instead of ThisTimeLineID, for clarity.
> >
> > True, it might not have any functionality effect in RemoveOldXlogFiles().
> > However it can be used in PreallocXlogFiles()->XLogFileInit() as well.
>
> PreallocXlogFiles() should have been put to the sword long ago. It's a
> performance tweak aimed at people without a performance problem in
> this area.

Creating, zeroing & fsync()'ing a 16MB file shouldn't be done in
individual transactions because it would increase latency noticeably. So
it seems it addresses a real performance problem. What do you dislike
about it?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-12-20 13:47:52 Re: Parser Cruft in gram.y
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-12-20 13:32:36 Re: ThisTimeLineID in checkpointer and bgwriter processes