Re: Avoiding overflow in timeout-related calculations

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Avoiding overflow in timeout-related calculations
Date: 2012-11-18 20:39:37
Message-ID: 20121118203936.GD1325@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2012-11-18 15:21:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I think at least wal_sender_timeout and wal_receiver_timeout are also
> > problematic.
>
> I looked at those and didn't see a problem --- what are you worried
> about exactly?

Forget it, too hungry to read the code properly...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-11-18 21:54:53 WIP: store additional info in GIN index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-18 20:21:34 Re: Avoiding overflow in timeout-related calculations