Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Date: 2012-10-19 18:33:41
Message-ID: 20121019183341.GC4860@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner escribió:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> > Also, it doesn't appear that we ever got around to preparing
> > documentation updates, but I think we definitely need some if
> > we're going to start throwing errors for things that used to be
> > allowed. Since Kevin has the most field experience with this
> > problem, I'd like to nominate him to write some docs ...
>
> OK, will do. The "redo the DELETE and RETURN NULL" workaround is
> not at all obvious; we should definitely include an example of that.

Any chance this patch could be pushed soon?

The problem is that this patch conflicts rather heavily with my FOR KEY
SHARE patch. I think it makes sense to commit this one first.

To me, it would be good enough that the code changes go in now; the doc
patch can wait a little longer.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2012-10-19 18:39:23 Re: pg_stat_lwlocks view - lwlocks statistics, round 2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-10-19 18:30:53 Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore