| From: | Levente Kovacs <leventelist(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: opened connection |
| Date: | 2012-10-01 06:59:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20121001085912.3891579d@jive.levalinux.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:24:47 -0700
Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> wrote:
> Unless you have very unique needs, keeping an open connection for
> days is just wrong anyway; if its for the sake of some user GUI or
> shell, there probably should be safeguards there to encourage users
> to not keep long-running transactions or connections.
Okay. Thanks for the answers. I implemented an alarm for the timeout, and I
close the connection when it is not needed in certain amount of time.
However, I have an other question.
Calling PQfinish() on an already closed connection makes my program
segfault. Is this normal?
Thank you,
Levente
--
Levente Kovacs
CTO, CSO
http://levente.logonex.eu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Mamin | 2012-10-01 07:34:15 | Planner choice on NULLs (9.1.5) with 2 conditional indexes |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2012-10-01 05:17:48 | Re: opened connection |