Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-09-06 01:43:29
Message-ID: 20120906014329.GE29484@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 09:33:35PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2012 09:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 09:56:32PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié sep 05 20:24:08 -0300 2012:
> >>>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> >>>>The only reason there is a significant delay is that the administrators
> >>>>have chosen not to run the process more than once every 4 hours. That's
> >>>>a choice not dictated by the process they are using, but by other
> >>>>considerations concerning the machine it's being run on. Since I am not
> >>>>one of the admins and don't really want to take responsibility for it I
> >>>>am not going to second guess them. On the very rare occasions when I
> >>>>absolutely have to have the totally up to date docs I build them myself
> >>>>- it takes about 60 seconds on my modest hardware.
> >>>I think the argument for having a quick docs build service is not about
> >>>the time needed, but the need to have all the appropriate tools
> >>>installed. While I can understand that argument for J Random Hacker,
> >>>I'm mystified why Bruce doesn't seem to have bothered to get a working
> >>>SGML toolset installed. It's not like editing the docs is a one-shot
> >>>task for him.
> >>As far as I understand, Bruce's concern is not about seeing the docs
> >>built himself, but having an HTML copy published somewhere that he can
> >>point people to, after applying some patch. To me, that's a perfectly
> >>legitimate reason to want to have them quickly.
> >Correct. I have always had a working SGML toolset. If we are not going
> >to have the developer site run more often, I will just go back to
> >setting up my own public doc build, like I used to do. I removed mine
> >when the official one was more current/reliable --- if that has changed,
> >I will return to my old setup, and publish my own URL for users to
> >verify doc changes.
>
> How often do you want? After all,
> <http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html> is
> presumably going to keep pointing to where it now points.

Well, the old code checked every five minutes, and it rebuilt in 4
minutes, so there was a max of 10 minutes delay.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-06 01:50:08 Re: Report proper GUC parameter names in error messages
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-06 01:42:55 Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows