Re: State of the on-disk bitmap index

From: Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)devise(dot)it>
To: Daniel Bausch <bausch(at)dvs(dot)tu-darmstadt(dot)de>
Cc: Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Subject: Re: State of the on-disk bitmap index
Date: 2012-09-05 14:59:13
Message-ID: 20120905145913.GC30785@leggeri.gi.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Daniel,

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:37:59PM +0200, Daniel Bausch wrote:
> Is that, what your bmi-perf-test.tar.gz from 2008 does? I did not
> look into that.

IIRC yes (but it's been a long time and I don't have a copy at hand
now).

Best regards,
Dr. Gianni Ciolli - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it | www.2ndquadrant.it

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-05 15:27:16 Re: 9.2rc1 produces incorrect results
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-09-05 14:55:28 Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest'