Re: multi-master pgbench?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multi-master pgbench?
Date: 2012-08-22 04:12:31
Message-ID: 20120822.131231.841132458032800876.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> As the maintainer of software that does multi-master, I'm a little
> confused as to why we would extend pg_bench to do this. The software
> in question should be doing the testing itself, ideally via
> it's test suite (i.e. "make test"). Having pg_bench do any of this
> would be at best a very poor subset of the tests the software
> should be performing. I suppose if the software *uses* pg_bench for
> its tests already, once could argue a limited test case - but it seems
> difficult to design some pg_bench options generic and powerful enough
> to handle other cases outside of the one software this change is aimed at.

Well, my point was in upthread:
> Right. If pgbench could have such a functionarlity, we could compare
> those projects by using pgbench. Currently those projects use
> different benchmarking tools. That means, the comparison is something
> like apple-to-orange. With enhanced pgbench we could do apple-to-apple
> comparison.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-08-22 04:26:36 Re: 64-bit API for large object
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2012-08-22 03:35:39 Re: multi-master pgbench?