Re: -Wformat-zero-length

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Date: 2012-08-03 16:44:35
Message-ID: 20120803164435.GA3463@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 06:09:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >> I was adding gcc printf attributes to more functions in obscure places,
> >> and now I'm seeing this in pg_upgrade:
>
> >> relfilenode.c:72:2: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length]
>
> > Shouldn't it be prep_status("\n")? If not, why not?
>
> On closer inspection, it appears to me that prep_status should never be
> called with a string containing a newline, period, and the test it
> contains for that case is just brain damage. The only reason to call it
> at all is to produce a line like
>
> message ......................
>
> where something more is expected to be added to the line later. Calls
> that are meant to produce a complete line could go directly to pg_log.
>
> This in turn implies that transfer_all_new_dbs's use of the function is
> broken and needs to be rethought.

I changed a prep_status() call to pg_log() as you suggested, and
backpatched to 9.2. Patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_upgrade.diff text/x-diff 1.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-08-03 16:51:03 Re: WIP pgindent replacement
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-08-03 16:43:06 Re: CreateLockFile() race condition