Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets
Date: 2012-06-07 15:57:50
Message-ID: 201206071757.50651.andres@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, June 07, 2012 05:55:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> > On 06/06/2012 04:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> I wonder if the whole issue doesn't require libpq to also try multiple
> >> hardcoded socket locations.
> >
> > I guess so.
>
> I don't really want to go there. Some use cases have been shown in
> this thread for having a server listen in multiple places, but that does
> not translate to saying that clients need to support automatically
> looking in multiple places. I think that mainly introduces questions we
> could do without, like which server did you actually end up contacting.
It would be really nice to have a development psql connect to a distro
installed psql and vice versa without having to specify -h /var/run/psql and -
h /tmp all the time...

Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-06-07 16:00:24 Re: Avoiding adjacent checkpoint records
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-07 15:56:28 Re: XLog changes for 9.3