Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost

From: Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann(at)janestreet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost
Date: 2012-01-05 14:34:27
Message-ID: 20120105143427.GG25235@ldn-qws-004.delacy.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/01/12 10:04, Benedikt Grundmann wrote:
>
> As a counter measure we are experimenting with
> enable_nestloop = off
> random_page_cost = 20 (instead of the previous 4).
>
For what it is worth we had to revert the enable_nestloop = off
change. It just moved the pain around by making other queries
perform much worse than before.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-05 14:35:45 Re: optimizing repeated MVCC snapshots
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-05 14:32:30 Re: random_page_cost vs seq_page_cost