Re: regression failure in CVS HEAD

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regression failure in CVS HEAD
Date: 2003-03-09 18:25:50
Message-ID: 20117.1047234350@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that
>> I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong.

> Yeah, I did -- which I why when I reported it initially I assumed that a
> build problem wasn't the cause.

Hm. One of the reasons I don't use --enable-depend is that I don't
trust it ;-) --- I prefer to do a make clean and rebuild after every
cvs update.

It's disturbing that we both saw similar failures, when there's no
obvious explanation for a build problem in the CVS logs. I have a
sneaking feeling that we haven't seen the last of this issue. But with
no ability to reproduce it, there's not much point in worrying now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-09 18:58:48 Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-09 17:50:49 Re: pg_dump: could not find namespace with OID