From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 |
Date: | 2011-06-27 17:59:07 |
Message-ID: | 201106271759.p5RHx7s03904@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
>
> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
This one which makes 50432 the default port.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/pg_upgrade | text/x-diff | 10.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-27 18:02:20 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the visibility map crash-safe. |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-06-27 17:56:37 | Re: generate_series() Interpretation |