| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |
| Date: | 2011-06-22 03:25:21 |
| Message-ID: | 201106220325.p5M3PLg20516@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Discussion seems to have ended on this thread without a clear direction.
>
> I still think the right thing is to just use a non-default port number.
> That gets 90% of the benefit for 10% of the work of any other approach
> (except for the ones for which the ratio is even worse).
I agree.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-06-22 03:54:20 | Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2011-06-22 03:24:34 | Re: Indication of db-shared tables |