Re: POSIX question

From: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Markus Wanner" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Subject: Re: POSIX question
Date: 2011-06-20 14:39:01
Message-ID: 201106201639.02157.rsmogura@softperience.eu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> Monday 20 of June 2011 16:16:58
> On Jun20, 2011, at 15:27 , Radosław Smogura wrote:
> > 1. mmap some large amount of anonymous virtual memory (this will be
> > maximum size of shared memory). ...
> > Point 1. will no eat memory, as memory allocation is delayed and in 64bit
> > platforms you may reserve quite huge chunk of this, and in future it may
> > be possible using mmap / munmap to concat chunks / defrag it etc.
>
> I think this breaks with strict overcommit settings (i.e.
> vm.overcommit_memory = 2 on linux). To fix that, you'd need a way to tell
> the kernel (or glibc) to simply reserve a chunk of virtual address space
> for further user. Not sure if there's a API for that...
>
> best regards,
> Florian Pflug

This may be achived by many other things, like mmap /dev/null.

Regards,
Radek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2011-06-20 14:39:40 Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-20 14:17:23 Re: Range Types and extensions