Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Date: 2011-06-17 15:15:19
Message-ID: 20110617151519.GB4407@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:20:04AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Florian Pflug's message of vie jun 17 10:03:56 -0400 2011:
>
> > How is that worse than the situation with "=~" and "~="?
>
> With =~ it is to the right, with ~= it is to the left.

To throw my user opinion into this ring (as a long time user of regexes
in many different systems) I've always taken the ~ to be short hand for
the 'approximately' notation (a squiggly equals) which has good semantic
match in my mind: a regex match is sort of a fuzzy equality. With that
model, the suggested pair is fairly mnemonic - the 'fuzzy' part i(the
pattern) is next to the squiggles, the 'concrete' part goes by the
equals.

> I have sometimes needed to look up which is which on ~ and ~~.

which has no such directionality, so yeah, no hinting there.

Ross
--
Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu
Systems Engineer & Admin, Research Scientist phone: 713-348-6166
Connexions http://cnx.org fax: 713-348-3665
Rice University MS-375, Houston, TX 77005
GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2011-06-17 15:17:13 Re: XPATH evaluation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-06-17 15:09:25 Re: XPATH evaluation