| From: | Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSI work for 9.1 |
| Date: | 2011-06-17 04:30:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20110617043016.GE83336@csail.mit.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:49:48PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Does this mean that the open item "more SSI loose ends" can now be
> marked resolved?
I was just looking at it and contemplating moving it to the non-blockers
list. Of the five items:
- (1) and (4) are resolved
- (2) isn't an issue -- maybe we want to add a comment, someplace but
I'm not convinced even that is necessary
- (3) is a regression test, and is already on the list separately
- (5) is a doc issue only
There are no open issues with the code that I'm aware of.
Dan
--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-17 04:32:46 | Re: SSI work for 9.1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-17 04:07:10 | Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |