Re: SSI patch renumbered existing 2PC resource managers??

From: Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI patch renumbered existing 2PC resource managers??
Date: 2011-06-13 19:29:24
Message-ID: 20110613192923.GS26076@csail.mit.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:22:19PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> As far as I can tell it was for purely cosmetic reasons, to have lock
> and predicate lock lines together.

Yes, that is the only reason.

Dan

--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-13 19:33:24 Re: SSI patch renumbered existing 2PC resource managers??
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-06-13 19:24:49 Re: [PATCH] Bug in XPATH() if expression returns a scalar value