Re: SSI work for 9.1

From: Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI work for 9.1
Date: 2011-06-09 18:03:20
Message-ID: 20110609180320.GM26076@csail.mit.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:30:27PM -0400, Dan Ports wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:06:18AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > Sounds reasonable, but why did you pass the snapshot to the
> > PredicateLockPage() call but not the PredicateLockRelation() call?
> > Oversight?
>
> Yep, just an oversight; long day yesterday. I'll fix the patch shortly

Attached. Only change is the missing snapshot argument to that one
call.

Dan

--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/

Attachment Content-Type Size
ssi-predlock-snapshot-4.patch text/x-diff 15.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-06-09 18:15:57 Re: could not truncate directory "pg_serial": apparent wraparound
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2011-06-09 18:00:31 Re: Bug in XPATH() produces invalid XML values and probably un-restorable dumps