Re: pg_upgrade bug found!

Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> bricklen,
>
> * bricklen (bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > Now, is this safe to run against my production database?
>
> Yes, with a few caveats. One recommendation is to also increase
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age to 500000000 (500m), which will hopefully
> prevent autovacuum from 'butting in' and causing issues during the
> process. Also, a database-wide 'VACUUM FREEZE;' should be lower-risk,
> if you can afford it (it will cause a lot of i/o on the system). The
> per-table 'VACUUM FREEZE <table>;' that the script does can end up
> removing clog files prematurely.
>
> > Anyone have any suggestions or changes before I commit myself to this
> > course of action?
>
> If you run into problems, and perhaps even before starting, you may want
> to pop in to #postgresql on irc.freenode.net, there are people there who
> can help you with this process who are very familiar with PG.

Stephen is 100% correct and we have updated the wiki to explain recovery
details:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/20110408pg_upgrade_fix

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +