From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: template0 database comment |
Date: | 2011-03-14 15:18:33 |
Message-ID: | 201103141518.p2EFIXh08673@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On l?r, 2011-03-12 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Shouldn't the "postgres" database get a comment too, while we're at
> > it? Perhaps "default database to connect to"?
>
> That's not actually true, though. Maybe it's the "default database used
> by administration programs"? In practice it might be "some otherwise
> unused database that's occasionally useful". ;-)
Based on previous discussion I have developed a patch to add comments
for 'postgres' and 'template0' databases:
postgres=> \l+
...
postgres | default administrative database
template0 | unmodifiable empty database
template1 | default template database
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/db.diff | text/x-diff | 799 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-14 15:21:15 | Re: Macros for time magic values |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-14 15:17:42 | Re: Indent authentication overloading |