| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Date: | 2011-02-17 03:12:13 |
| Message-ID: | 201102170312.p1H3CDQ06535@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:53 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > > In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient
> > > to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.
> >
> > I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would,
> > and certainly don't agree with it.
>
> Yeah I am not sure I can buy Tom's argument here. The GPL is fairly
> clear and is compatible with the BSD/Postgres license.
Compatible if you want the result to be GPL, yes. I hardly see that as
desirable. I am unclear what is being said above.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-17 03:15:02 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2011-02-17 02:59:32 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |