Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Date: 2011-02-08 19:12:53
Message-ID: 20110208191253.GP4116@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Jeff Davis (pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com) wrote:
> I appreciate the sentiment, but in addition to some cleanup, any patch
> like this at least requires some discussion. It's a language change
> we'll be supporting for a long time.

My feeling was that we have had at least some of that discussion this
past fall... It's not like you went out and developed this completely
outside of any community contact. Perhaps it's just not as
controversial as you're expecting. :)

> At minimum, we're a couple hundred emails shy of a real consensus on the
> naming ;)

*smirk.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-02-08 19:13:15 Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-02-08 19:10:04 Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2