From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |
Date: | 2011-02-08 04:52:01 |
Message-ID: | 20110208045201.GA28077@tornado.gateway.2wire.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:16:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> So
> can we just get rid of should_be_detoasted, and have exec_eval_datum()
> or its callers instead test:
>
> !var->isnull && var->datatype->typbyval && var->datatype->typlen == -1
> && VARATT_IS_EXTENDED(var->value)
FWIW, this is what I meant by option 2 in my summary.
> I haven't tested this, but it's not clear that'd be measurably slower
> than checking a single Boolean.
Pavel benchmarked this or something close, measuring a performance loss:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTikDHekc9r38w2ttzoMDr8vDaVAnr3LhqfJkEuL9@mail.gmail.com
Tom also expressed concern over performance:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/24266.1295462892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Not sure what's next.
nm
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Singer | 2011-02-08 05:16:01 | Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-08 04:34:07 | Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump |