Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Date: 2011-01-20 19:53:06
Message-ID: 20110120195306.GA20864@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:48:59PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > How much has that code been updated from one release to the next?
>
> Just an FYI, I talked to depesz on IRC (please chime in if you disagree
> with any of this) and he indicated that he's had to update the code
> from time to time, mostly because the parser was too strict.
>
> He also mentioned that he didn't feel it was terribly complicated or
> that it'd be difficult to update for this. Looking over the code, it's
> got a simple regex for matching that line which would have to be
> updated, but I don't think it'd require much more than that.

i'll be happy to update the Pg::Explain to handle new elements of
textual plans, so if this would be of concern - please don't treat
"compatibility with explain.depesz.com" as your responsibility/problem.

I'll fix the parser (have to add json/xml parsing too anyway), and I,
too, would love to get more information.

Best regards,

depesz

--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-01-20 20:15:28 Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-20 19:51:27 Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups