Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Date: 2010-12-23 22:49:14
Message-ID: 20101223224914.GC4933@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> However, it'd be a real good idea for that role to be NOLOGIN if it's
> there by default.

Definitely. I'd also suggest we WARN if someone creates a situation
where a role has both replication and login, and maybe prevent it
altogether, it's just a bad idea..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-23 22:57:25 Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-12-23 22:45:44 Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+