| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions |
| Date: | 2010-12-23 22:45:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20101223224519.GB4933@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Josh Berkus (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com) wrote:
> 1) have a replication permission
Right, that's what this patch is about.
> 2) *by default* create a replication user with the replication
> permission when we initdb.
I'm not entirely sure about this one.. I'm not against it but I'm also
not really 'for' it. :)
> 3) have an example line for a replication connection by the replication
> user in the default pg_hba.conf (commented out).
Sure.
> 4) change all our docs and examples to use that replication user.
I don't have a problem with that.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-12-23 22:45:44 | Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+ |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-23 22:44:02 | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions |