Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons
Date: 2010-11-20 19:47:20
Message-ID: 201011202047.21238.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 20 November 2010 18:18:32 Robert Haas wrote:
> > Likewise for the int64 case, which BTW is no safer for pre-C99 compilers
> > than it was yesterday: LL is not the portable way to write int64
> > constants.
> Gah. I wish we had some documentation of this stuff.
Dito. I started doing Cish stuff quite a bit *after* C99 was mostly available
in gcc...

Sorry btw, for not realizing those points (and the regression-expectation file)
myself...

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2010-11-20 20:11:43 Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons
Previous Message Andres Freund 2010-11-20 19:41:03 Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons