| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
| Date: | 2010-11-17 20:58:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20101117205846.GA13723@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:48:52PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 03:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >I don't particularly care for the name UNSYNCED, and I'm starting
> >not to like UNLOGGED much either, although at least that one is an
> >actual word. PERMANENT and the flavors of TEMPORARY are a
> >reasonably comprehensible as a description of user-visible
> >behavior, but UNLOGGED and UNSYNCED sounds a lot like they're
> >discussing internal details that the user might not actually
> >understand or care about. I don't have a better idea right off the
> >top of my head, though.
>
> Maybe VOLATILE for UNSYNCED? Not sure about UNLOGGED.
+1 for describing the end-user-visible behavior.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2010-11-17 20:59:18 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-17 20:51:37 | Re: unlogged tables |