| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
| Date: | 2010-11-16 22:07:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20101116220735.GJ2596@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:00:33PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Yeah, you'd have to allow a flag to control the behavior. And in
> > that case I'd rather the flag have a single default rather than
> > different defaults depending on whether or not individual tables
> > were selected. Something like --omit-unlogged-data.
>
> Are you sure we don't want to default the other way?
+1 for defaulting the other way.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-16 22:08:00 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-11-16 22:00:33 | Re: unlogged tables |