From: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
Date: | 2010-10-14 18:40:57 |
Message-ID: | 201010142040.57444.rsmogura@softperience.eu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
> Regarding JDBC in the CF process -- other interfaces are handled
> there. I haven't seen one patch this size for JDBC since I've been
> involved, let alone two competing patches to implement the same
> feature. Small patches which can be quickly handled don't make sense
> to put into the process, but it seemed reasonable for these.
In any way I'm sending this patch, and I will put this under Miscellaneous in
CF. This cleared patch takes only 47k (in uncleared was some binary read
classes) and about 50% it's big test case.
Have a nice day,
Radek
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
statemnt_to_20101014.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 8.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-14 18:50:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-10-14 18:34:54 | Re: BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-14 21:57:37 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-10-14 17:25:13 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |