| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: security label support, part.2 |
| Date: | 2010-08-18 02:40:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20100818024034.GC26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com) wrote:
> I believed that table inheritance is a unique feature in PostgreSQL.
It's actually not..
> Does the SQL spec really mention about whether a child table is an
> independent table object, or not?
The SQL spec does discuss 'subtables' and inheiritance. It also does
describe some information under 'Access Rules' regarding these
sub-tables (check the 'table definition' clause). I've been looking at
them and trying to make some sense out of what I see.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-18 03:02:57 | Re: security label support, part.2 |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-08-18 01:33:28 | Re: security label support, part.2 |