Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions
Date: 2010-08-09 16:54:38
Message-ID: 201008091654.o79Gsc318521@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/7/21 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > 2010/7/20 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >> here is a new version - new these functions are not a strict and
> >> function to_string is marked as stable.
> >
> > We have array_to_string(anyarray, text) and string_to_array(text, text),
> > and you'll introduce to_string(anyarray, text, text) and
> > to_array(text, text, text).
>
> I have to repeat it, the behave of this functions are little bit
> different. string_to_array and array_to_string are buggy.
>
> * it isn't support a NULL
> * it doesn't differentiate a empty array and NULL
> * we cannot to change default behave of existing functions
> * array_to_string is badly marked as IMMUTABLE

This email thread linked to from our TODO list explains that arrays
combined with NULLs have many inconsistenciess:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-11/msg00009.php

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Oliveira 2010-08-09 17:14:54 Re: Universal B-tree
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-08-09 16:54:35 Re: Universal B-tree