Re: GROUPING SETS revisited

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GROUPING SETS revisited
Date: 2010-08-03 19:58:03
Message-ID: 20100803195803.GR5082@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:50:00PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
> In case anyone's interested, I've taken the CTE-based grouping sets
> patch from [1] and made it apply to 9.1, attached. I haven't yet
> done things like checked it for whitespace consistency, style
> conformity, or anything else, but (tuits permitting) hope to figure
> out how it works and get it closer to commitability in some upcoming
> commitfest.
>
> I mention it here so that if someone else is working on it, we can
> avoid duplicated effort, and to see if a CTE-based grouping sets
> implementation is really the way we think we want to go.
>
> [1]
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00700.php

I've added back one file in the patch enclosed here. I'm still
getting compile fails from

CC="ccache gcc" ./configure --prefix=$PG_PREFIX --with-pgport=$PGPORT --with-perl --with-libxml --enable-debug --enable-cassert
make

Log from that also enclosed.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Attachment Content-Type Size
gs91_02.patch text/plain 23.8 KB
make.log text/plain 8.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Tolley 2010-08-03 20:20:52 Re: GROUPING SETS revisited
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-03 19:53:51 Re: (9.1) btree_gist support for searching on "not equals"