Re: Misplaced pg_upgrade_support.so ?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Glen Barber <glen(dot)j(dot)barber(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Misplaced pg_upgrade_support.so ?
Date: 2010-06-08 00:08:25
Message-ID: 201006080008.o5808PS13846@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Glen Barber wrote:
> On 6/7/10 7:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> [snip]
> >>
> >
> > Interestingly, I apparently would have had this issue with beta1:
> >
> > %pwd
> > /usr/local/pgsql-beta1/bin
> > %./pg_config --pkglibdir
> > /usr/local/pgsql-beta1/lib/postgresql
> > %cd ../../pgsql-beta2/bin/
> > %./pg_config --pkglibdir
> > /usr/local/pgsql-beta2/lib/postgresql
> >
> > I've attached pg_config output for both. To rule out something off with
> > my environment, I'm currently setting up a test environment on a
> > different machine, where I'll check out HEAD as well as beta1 and beta2.
> > Unless, of course, I'm missing something very obvious in the attached
> > output.
> >
>
> After just realizing CONFIGURE isn't showing what I would expect to see,
> I rebuilt after removing the original source directories. It looks like
> I didn't 'gmake clean' before reconfiguring for the new target directories.
>
> Sorry for the noise. Thank you for taking the time to look.

No problem. Glad we confirmed the cause.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John T. Dow 2010-06-08 01:11:10 Re: Re: Error on Windows server could not open relation base/xxx/xxx Permission denied
Previous Message Glen Barber 2010-06-08 00:03:11 Re: Misplaced pg_upgrade_support.so ?