Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jon Schewe <jpschewe(at)mtu(dot)net>
Subject: Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-06-04 14:33:22
Message-ID: 201006041633.23343.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Friday 04 June 2010 16:25:30 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote:
> >> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish
> >> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish
> >> ext3: 15 minutes to finish
> >> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish
> >
> > My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences.
> > ext4 uses barriers by default, ext3 does not.
> Or, to put it more clearly: the reason ext3 is fast is that it's unsafe.
Jon: To verify you can enable it via the barrier=1 option during mounting..

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-06-04 15:06:39 Re: Weird XFS WAL problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-04 14:25:30 Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL