Re: pg_migrator

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator
Date: 2010-04-27 01:46:15
Message-ID: 201004270146.o3R1kFv09595@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. ?Do
> > we still want to do that?
>
> I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for
> keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the
> 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. So
> I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at
> some point down the road.

You might also remember I was outvoted. It will not be hard to put it
in /contrib as that is already a valid build option for pg_migrator.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-04-27 01:55:30 Re: pg_migrator
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-27 01:32:47 Re: pg_migrator